In the inflation/reflation debate, gold could winJoe Foster, Portfolio Manager and Strategist09 February 2021
Gold had a strong start to the year, moving to its monthly high of US$1,959 per ounce on January 6 at the same time the U.S. dollar index (DXY) fell to a fresh three-year low. However, gold quickly reversed course as it became clear the Democrats had won the runoff election in Georgia, which, with the help of a democratic vice president, gave them control of the Senate. With this crucial victory, markets quickly embarked on a “reflation trade”, betting that the Democrats would pass trillions of dollars of additional spending on pandemic relief, infrastructure and green initiatives. Interest rates spiked higher, taking ten-year treasuries to a ten-month high of 1.18% in mid-January. The rise in rates bolstered the US dollar, driving the DXY to its monthly high on January 18, while gold fell to its monthly low of US$1,804.
We had thought that a victory for the Democrats would be positive for gold because it might lead to more deficit spending, higher taxes and more regulations. However, the near-term rise in yields and the dollar overwhelmed the longer-term implications, at least for now. Gold trended higher in the second half of the month as rates and the dollar eased. Gold ended the month at lower at US$1,847.65 and the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index fell 3.5%.
Hi ho silver!
Gold gained support at month-end when trading excitement broke out in silver. Early in the month, investors using Reddit targeted electronic game store GameStop and other relatively small companies with large short interest as buying opportunities. The retail buying and short covering by hedge funds drove GameStop to a 1,625% gain in January. On January 28, Reddit traders turned their attention to silver, which they allege is being suppressed by banks to mask inflation. By 1 February, silver had jumped 15% to US$29 per ounce in three days. The Solactive Global Silver Miners Index gained 23%, and individual silver stocks jumped as much as 59%. Trading volumes and inflows to silver bullion exchange traded products also surged.
Manipulation no match for fundamentals
It’s a big stretch for the Reddit traders to go from targeting a small stock with enormous short interest like GameStop, to targeting the multi-billion dollar silver industry. It appears that their investment decisions focus on conspiracy theories, social justice, and mob rule rather than commodity and industry fundamentals. Nonetheless, they represent a new type of investor to silver that may enable it to trade at higher levels. Silver has been in a bull market with gold, so we don’t see it in a short squeeze. In fact, net speculative positioning in silver futures has been long for over a year. The gold/silver ratio is currently at 68, which is near the ten-year average of 70. The ratio hit a low of 31 in 2011 when silver reached its all-time high of US$49.80. Silver also reached US$30 per ounce only when gold hit fresh highs last August. Therefore, higher silver prices here would be well within historic norms. However, many silver stocks are now trading at extraordinary multiples and may pull back once the Reddit frenzy has run its course.
Reddit/WallStreetBets is the first black swan event since the COVID crash. It is the unintended consequence of radical government policies that drove rates to zero, created trillions of dollars of free money and a society with copious free time. A free market system cannot achieve its function of price discovery and efficient capital allocation if it is subjected to manipulation, government mandates or mob rule. Free markets have been weakened by Reddit/WallStreetBets. In the current environment, the next black swan may bring more ominous damage to the financial system.
Reflation versus inflation
There has been a lot of talk in the press on inflation since the Democrats took control of the White House. We find this misplaced, as there is a difference between reflation, which is stimulating the economy to get back to normal growth, and excessive inflation, which is a rise in wages and prices. The chart shows that inflation expectations have simply returned to normal levels of around 2%, where they have been for decades. The chart also shows how inflation expectations cratered with the deflationary shocks of the financial crisis in 2008 and the COVID crisis in 2020. In both crisis, inflation expectation rebounded to historic norms. Gold is not reacting to inflationary pressures because there is not yet any evidence of excessive inflation.
US market inflation expectations (5 years ahead)
Source: Bloomberg. Data as of December 2020.
Inflation: Case for versus case against
Here, we contrast the cases for and against inflation.
Case for inflation:
- Shortage of manufacturing workers caused by new e-commerce jobs with higher wages;
- The end of cheap labor in China and Asia in general;
- COVID-19 has reduced capacity in many industries;
- The pandemic has also reduced the pace of globalisation and international trade;
- A savings glut and pent-up demand will bring a surge in post-pandemic spending;
- The Fed can never raise rates for fear of crashing the stock market and making debt service unbearable;
- The Fed has adjusted policies to enable inflation above its 2% target;
- It is hard to believe the shift to concerted fiscal/monetary stimulus on an unprecedented scale won’t bring an inflationary cycle;
- The last time we saw such stimulus in the US was in response to the depression and WW ll, which brought an inflationary cycle in which the annual change in the CPI peaked at 19.7% in March of 1947.
Case against inflation:
- With the pandemic, spending has focused on goods, so future demand has been satiated;
- There is no pent-up demand in services, only a return to normal; you only need one haircut or you might take that cruise, but not five cruises;
- High levels of unemployed will act as an ongoing drag on wages;
- Accelerating technological change will keep the cost of goods in check;
- The Fed has been trying to generate inflation for over a decade without success;
- Excessive debt and aging demographics will keep a lid on growth;
- Millions of households are behind on rent and mortgage payments;
- A savings glut reflects more conservative consumers traumatised by the pandemic that spend less;
- Negative rates, massive QE and fiscal stimulus have failed to prompt inflation in Japan for decades recently, Japan has been in deflation for three months.
And the winner is... gold
Weighing the pros and cons, we believe history provides the best guide. The Japan model makes a compelling case against inflation. However, the post-WWll model makes an inflationary cycle the most likely outcome, given the overwhelming stimulus efforts. This would be the most bullish for gold, although a low growth, low inflation outcome presents abundant risks that could also drive gold for years. Such risks include debt problems, even more radical fiscal and monetary policies, worsening income disparity and social unrest.Issued by VanEck Investments Limited ABN 22 146 596 116 AFSL 416755 (‘VanEck’) as the responsible entity and issuer of units in the VanEck Vectors ETFs traded on ASX. This is general information only about financial products and not personal financial advice. It does not take into account any person’s individual objectives, financial situation or needs. Before making an investment decision, you should read the relevant PDS and with the assistance of a financial adviser consider if it is appropriate for your circumstances. PDSs are available at www.vaneck.com.au or by calling 1300 68 38 37. All investments carry some level of risk. Investing in international markets has specific risks that are in addition to the typical risks associated with investing in the Australian market. These include currency/foreign exchange fluctuations, ASX trading time differences and changes in foreign regulatory and tax regulations. See the PDS for details.
NYSE®Arca Gold Miners Index®is a trademark of ICE Data Indices, LLC or its affiliates (“ICE Data”) and has been licensed for use by VanEck in connection with the US Fund. Neither the Trust nor the Fund is sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by ICE Data. ICE Data makes no representations or warranties regarding the Trust or the Fund or the ability of the NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index to track general stock market performance.
ICE DATA MAKES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, AND HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE NYSE ARCA GOLD MINERS INDEX OR ANY DATA INCLUDED THEREIN. IN NO EVENT SHALL ICE DATA HAVE ANY LIABILITY FOR ANY SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING LOST PROFITS), EVEN IF NOTIFIED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
No member of VanEck group of companies gives any guarantee or assurance as to the repayment of capital, the payment of income, the performance, or any particular rate of return of any VanEck funds. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance.
© 2021 VanEck